On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, fglock wrote: > Dave Rolsky wrote: > > It can go under modules/ if Rich is ok with moving the CVS. But I for one > > wouldn't want to move it without preserving the version history, which > > requires SourceForge staff help. > > The version history is not very important at this point, because I'm > actually working on a brand new implementation. It preserves the API, > docs, and tests, but changes all the code.
If it's important or not is really up to Rich, don't you think? > Another option would be to distribute Date::ICal 2.xx with the DateTime > bundle, while the pure-perl Date::ICal 1.xx would stay as a separate > module for a while. People who install Date::ICal get the traditional > one, while people who dare to install DateTime will have Date::ICal > upgraded. I'd rather not do this. Date::ICal should be separate from DateTime.pm, same as Time::Piece (which Matt S is reworking to inherit from DateTime). -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
