Of course the overloaded stringification sub could look at its call
stack and see who was calling it and skip stringification if it was
Devel::StackTrace or Carp... But that is _really_ gross.
-ben
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:01:39PM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Matt Sisk wrote:
>
> > Hmmm, I guess not. At least, I couldn't get 'no overload' to do anything
> > useful.
> >
> > How much of a PITA is it to use overload::StrVal and
> > overload::Overloaded in Devel::StackTrace?
>
> Not a PITA at all, I just liked the other solution even more.
>
>
> -dave
>
> /*=======================
> House Absolute Consulting
> www.houseabsolute.com
> =======================*/
