Please post your server build error. Chris
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 12:46 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Codec Engine 2.0.1 woes > > Greetings, > > I saw some time ago that some people were getting a version > conflict with > ti.rtdx package while building the CE 2.0 and Chris Ring said that it > should be fixed in the patch release 2.0.1... > > Well, after jumping through the numerous hoops to change our > memory map > from 256M to 128M (which works fine) in dsplink and codec > engine, building > the server gives the "incompatible use of package" error. > > Since I just want to see if it will build and run at all, > where the heck do > I stick that environment setting that makes those errors turn into > warnings? > > Also, any news on CE 2.1? > I'd really like to use the newest dsplink and bios with our server. > > I must rant a little though: > > [rant] > > TI packages win the award for most obfuscated build systems, > hands down. > Also, CE and friends are so finely tuned to use the evmDM6446 in their > configurations that even though we're running a custom board we had to > modify all the DM6446-related files/entities to match our > DM6441 design > with less memory because of the huge amount of file changes > that it would > take to get the build systems to even recognize a custom platform. > > I'd rather not spend the day looking for 'ti.platforms.evmDM6446' and > adding if statement conditionals so the builds don't crap out with > "unsupported platform" > Considering the fact that developments are likely to not be > stuffing evm > boards inside their products, I'd think that the > customization would be a > higher priority rather than make it work on the dvevm. > > Please note that these comments do not negate all the work > that was put > into making all this work in the first place... as far as the dvevm is > concerned. > > However, they do come from a dev team whose so far faced: audio driver > lock-up issues, bad to no SD card support, poor osd framebuffer > performance, and now CE issues... not quite the boost in > development that > we'd hoped for. Our bosses are getting tired of listening to our > explanations of why we're stuck on so and so or things just > need tweaking > or it's still a new platform. > > [/rant] > > -- David > > DAVID A. KONDRAD > Software Design Engineer > On-Q/Legrand > www.onqlegrand.com > > _______________________________________________ > Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list > [email protected] > http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source > _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
