-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. >
Hello, > Besides, how are you using DaVinci? Asking because OMAP-L1xx/ and > DA8xx both seem to be targeted to the different market niches than > DaVinci -- at least the former completely lack the video support that > the later offered... > Video applications, industrial control(mainly HMI) and data acquisition. SOC can be 6446, 355 or 335 depending on the cost/performance criteria. I agree that these are not primary areas for OMAP-L1xx but I'm sure it will be offered to many portable applications. Besides, it's unique in one way compared to DaVincis, a floating point dsp which offers developers more flexible programming. I'll not be surprised if many people prefer OMAP-L1xx to DaVinci with these compatible price levels. Best regards, Caglar -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkl4rh4ACgkQ/nL+S5dojegDFQCeKD/16FQkAZWsACCIJJZOVqzj 32QAoKvQ2J79knrgT93Fh5SX0EHJO/zs =6in4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
