Hi, Philby,

I tried several steps as you suggested before, but the problem was not
solved by now. and when I mount the jffs2, there are some errors printed by
the kernel.

and I want to know if the MV Linux Professional Edition 4.0 does match the
LargePage NAND flash or not. You know, when I use the original source code
of the MV Linux, the linux kernel scanned the nand flash as all the blocks
was bad blocks. and my NAND flash info is the following:
============
TI UBL Version: 1.14, Flash type: NAND
Booting PSP Boot Loader
PSPBootMode = NAND
Starting NAND Copy...
Initializing NAND flash...
Manufacturer ID  = 0x00000020
Device ID        = 0x000000A1
Pages Per Block  = 0x00000040
Number of Blocks = 0x00000400
Bytes Per Page   = 0x00000800
Valid MagicNum found.
NAND Boot success.
   DONE
============
So I want to find the reasons from this place, maybe there are some mistake
in the configration of the MV linux kernel. So, WIll you give me some tips
about the NAND configration in the MV linux? Such as the kernel
configration, the NAND OOB info, the NAND ECC info, or the process of the
BBT building.
Thank you.

Best Wishes,
Zhang
2009/3/23 Philby John <[email protected]>

> Zhang,
>
>        Please keep the mailing list in the loop, someone might have a
> solution
> or could use your solution.
>
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:18 +0800, shaofeng zhang wrote:
> > Dear Sir,
>
> Sorry, let me introduce myself, my name is Philby.
>  >
> > I am sorry to reply your email lately. Because we were rendering our
> > lab's wall these days.
> >
> > And I try to define the YAFFS_IGNORE_TAGS_ECC in the
> > fs/yaffs2/yaffs_ecc.h
> > but there is still the error message:
> >
> > r...@xjtuipcevm:~# df -h
> > Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> > rootfs                 38G   28G  8.0G  78% /
> > /dev/root              38G   28G  8.0G  78% /
> > none                   10M  2.5M  7.6M  25% /dev
> > tmpfs                  59M     0   59M   0% /tmp
> > none                   10M  2.5M  7.6M  25% /dev
> > tmpfs                  59M     0   59M   0% /dev/shm
> > /dev/mtdblock4        120M  120M     0 100% /mnt/nand
> > And I should tell you that before I modified
> > the /drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c, there is a mistake when the linux
> > kernel is starting:
> > my board can automaticly boots from the NAND flash througth TI UBL and
> > U-boot 1.2.0. But when starting the linux kernel, there will be the
> > warning messages like this:
> > Starting kernel ...
> > Uncompressing
> >
> Linux.................................................................................................................................done.
> Booting the kernel.
> > ................(the pre-messages is omitted)
> > NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x20, Chip ID: 0xa1 (ST Micro NAND
> > 128MiB 1,8V 8-bit)
> > Scanning device for bad blocks
> > Bad eraseblock 0 at 0x00000000
> > Bad eraseblock 1 at 0x00020000
> > Bad eraseblock 2 at 0x00040000
> > ...........
> > Bad eraseblock 1020 at 0x07f80000
> > Bad eraseblock 1021 at 0x07fa0000
> > Bad eraseblock 1022 at 0x07fc0000
> > Bad eraseblock 1023 at 0x07fe0000
> > ...........
> >  and My Nand Flash is STMICRO's product: NAND01GR3B2B, whose
> > infomation is the following tips: Manufacturer ID  = 0x20, Device ID
> > = 0xA1,Pages Per Block  = 0x40,Number of Blocks = 0x400,Bytes Per Page
> > = 0x800.
> >
> > I now that the UBL and U-boot can boot from the NAND flash, so I
> > changed the nand_bbt.c(/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c) the same as the
> > u-boot/drives/nand/nand_bbt.c,and the kernel mesage shows that there
> > are few bad blocks in the nand flash.
>
> What modifications have you done in nand_bbt.c ? After your
> modifications, yaffs2 reports lesser error? How few are the reported bad
> blocks? All NAND based flash devices contain some bad blocks at
> manufacture, so if its really few then it shouldn't be a cause of worry.
>
> >
> >  So what is your advice when you are facing this problem? I guess
> > there may be some faults in the nand_bbt.c(driveis/mtd/nand)? Is it?
>
> I have no idea. But here are some steps you could do to narrow the cause
> of your problem.
>
> 1) Switch to jffs2 to see if the problem goes away. If yes, you could
> use jffs2 or start debugging the yaffs2 fs code. Turn on debugging using
> echo all > /proc/yaffs before mounting the fs.
>
> 2) Switch to using btt on RAM instead of flash and see if the problem
> exists? You could so this by changing to this->options |=
> (NAND_USE_DATA_ADJACENT_OOB); in function nand_davinci_probe() -> case
> NAND_ECC_HW_SYNDROME:
> ie: get rid of the NAND_USE_FLASH_BBT option.
>
> 3)Erase mtdblock4 partition from Uboot specifying the offset to the
> start of your nand fs and the size of your fs (mtdblock4)
> eg: nand erase 0x2400000 0x5e00000
> This will clear all your previous factory marked bbt entries, so use
> this at your discretion.
>
>
> Regards,
> Philby
>
> >
> >
> > 2009/3/19 Philby John <[email protected]>
> >         Zhang,
> >
> >                You could try defining YAFFS_IGNORE_TAGS_ECC in
> >         fs/yaffs2/yaffs_ecc.h
> >         and give it a shot. If this works it would mean, h/w ECC uses
> >         up the OOB
> >         spare area leaving no space
> >         for YAFFS2 to mark bad blocks hence showing 100% usage.
> >
> >         Regards,
> >         Philby
> >
> >
> >
> >         On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 12:55 -0500, Narnakaje, Snehaprabha
> >         wrote:
> >         > Zhang,
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > Which software codebase/release are you using here on DM6446
> >         EVM?
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > The default NAND configuration for DM6446 EVM is to use a
> >         small block
> >         > NAND flash (with page size = 512bytes) and 1-bit HW ECC. If
> >         the driver
> >         > configuration does not match with what the NAND device
> >         expects, all
> >         > blocks of the NAND device can come back as bad blocks. In
> >         which case,
> >         > the corresponding partition will have 100% space used.
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > Thanks
> >         >
> >         > Sneha
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> >         > 
> > From:[email protected]<from%[email protected]>
> >         >
> >         [mailto:[email protected]]
> On
> >         > Behalf Of shaofeng zhang
> >         > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 11:22 PM
> >         > To: [email protected]
> >         > Subject: Problem with YAFFS2 on LargePage NAND
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > Hi, All,
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > I am using a 128MB LargePage Nand Flash on my DVEVM board
> >         (DM6446),
> >         > and when I mount the /dev/mtdblock4 throught YAFFS2 fs type,
> >         I found
> >         > that the use% of my nand is 100% as the following:
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> >         > rootfs                 38G   28G  8.0G  78% /
> >         > /dev/root              38G   28G  8.0G  78% /
> >         > none                   10M  2.5M  7.6M  25% /dev
> >         > tmpfs                  59M     0   59M   0% /tmp
> >         > none                   10M  2.5M  7.6M  25% /dev
> >         > tmpfs                  59M     0   59M   0% /dev/shm
> >         > /dev/mtdblock4        120M  120M     0 100% /mnt/nand
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > But I first use flash_eraseall to erase the /dev/mtd4 before
> >         mounting
> >         > the /dev/mtdblock4 with YAFFS2
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > Could anyone tell me some info about the message?
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > Thank you!
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > Best Wishes,
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > Zhang
> >         >
> >         >
> >
> >         > _______________________________________________
> >         > Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
> >         > [email protected]
> >
> >         >
> >
> http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
> >
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to