Kevin Hilman wrote: > Well, it's not actually this patch that started the problem, it was > the platform_data updates where clock names were added as part of the > new platform_data struct shared between platform code and ASoC. > > My original proposal was to pass a clock pointer, not a clock name, > but that was not done, so... > > I've pushed an update my 'temp/asoc' branch with the patch below which > converts to pasing clock pointers instead of clock names. > > I'll rework this into two parts. One for DaVinci git and one for > Mark's for-2.6.32 branch and submit. > > Kevin >
Can you explain the philosophy of why this is better than the previous? They look about the same to me. Both call clk_get with a name string, just in a different place. _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
