"Nori, Sekhar" <[email protected]> writes:

> On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 00:31:41, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Sekhar Nori <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > This patch supports runtime detection of DA830 UI card and
>> > eliminates the need for DA830_UI config option. Successful
>> > probe of GPIO expander present on the UI card is used to
>> > detect its presence. For this reason, GPIO_PCF857X is auto-
>> > selected when DA830 EVM is configured. In case the UI card
>> > is absent, the probe fails in reasonable time.
>> >
>> > As a side effect this patch also gets rid of the voilation
>> > of Documentation/SubmittingPatches section 2.2 in function
>> > da830_evm_ui_expander_setup()
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <[email protected]>
>>
>> Looks great, thanks.
>>
>> One comment/question below.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > +static int da830_evm_ui_expander_setup(struct i2c_client *client, int 
>> > gpio,
>> > +           unsigned ngpio, void *context)
>> > +{
>> > +   gpio_request(gpio + 6, "MUX_MODE");
>>
>> This name isn't very descripitve when seen in debugfs.  Would "UI mux mode"
>> be more appropriate?  If not, please suggest something else and I'll
>> update before committing.
>
> The name is coming from a signal name in the UI card schematics.
> The signal is actually called "MUX_MODE" so, "UI mux_mode" seems
> appropriate to me.

OK, will make this small change before pushing.

Thanks,

Kevin

_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to