On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:40 AM, Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02.09.2010 4:30, Victor Rodriguez wrote:
>
>>>> Basic support for Hawkboard OMAPL138 just UART cominication is included
>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Victor Rodriguez<[email protected]>
>
>>>> Notes:  This patch deletes empty lines and typo mistakes from previous
>>>> version
>
>>>   These notes belong to the space under the --- tear line, not to the
>>> patch
>>> description.
>
>> Ok sorry my mistake, fIxed for next version
>
>>>>        This patch is checked with
>>>> 0a50e05b20f3c6af67656303bdb3661a2541ce03
>>>> from
>>>>        Kernel development tree for TI DaVinci family of processors
>
>>>>        This patch works with basic da8xx_omapl_defconfig, it just have
>>>> basic support
>>>>        for UART console
>
>>>>        This patch just works with UART 2 for argo file system
>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Victor Rodriguez<[email protected]>
>
>>> [...]
>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig
>>>> b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig
>>>> index 2bf03e9..fd8a11c 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -185,6 +185,15 @@ config MACH_TNETV107X
>>>>        help
>>>>          Say Y here to select the TI TNETV107X Evaluation Module.
>>>>  +config MACH_OMAPL138_HAWKBOARD
>>>> +       bool "TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18xx Hawkboard(.org) Platform"
>>>> +       default ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
>
>>>   As I've already said, only EVM boards are enabled by default.
>
>> Question i have deleted the
>
>> default ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
>
>> but I have a problem because my board-da850-hawk.c does not compile
>> and because of that when i boot the uImage is impossible to uncompress
>> my kernel image.
>
>> So do you suggest any other way to fix that with out altering the
>> da8xx_omapl_defconfig?
>
>   Why do you not want to alter it? I think you should.


Because the discussion that exist in defconfig files in the
[email protected] mailing list, Linus complain about the
lack of order in defconfig files.

But if you sugest that is ok i would try to modify .

So i leave the Kconfig just like this ?

+config MACH_OMAPL138_HAWKBOARD
+       bool "TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18xx Hawkboard(.org) Platform"
+       depends on ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
+       help
+         Say Y here to select the TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18xx Hawkboard.
+         Information of this board may be found at
+         http://www.hawkboard.org/
+


Thanks

Sincerely yours

VIctor  Rodriguez


>> I have already checked the latest change in Kconfig ant is
>
>> config MACH_TNETV107X
>>        bool "TI TNETV107X Reference Platform"
>>        default ARCH_DAVINCI_TNETV107X
>>        depends on ARCH_DAVINCI_TNETV107X
>>        help
>>          Say Y here to select the TI TNETV107X Evaluation Module.
>
>> which also has default.
>
>   Because this is the evaluation board.
>
>> Please clarify this doubt Is one of the few thinks that i need in
>> order to implement the patch
>
>>> [...]
>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-hawk.c
>>>> b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-hawk.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..4a7f2da
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-hawk.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Hawkboard.org based on TI's OMAP-L138 Platform
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Initial code: Syed Mohammed Khasim
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2009 Texas Instruments Incorporated -
>>>> http://www.ti.com
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Derived from: arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-hawk.c
>
>   Oh, and this was bogus too.
>
>>>> + * Original Copyrights follow:
>>>> + *
>>>> + * 2007, 2009 (c) MontaVista Software, Inc. This file is licensed under
>
>>>   As I said, the original copyright is invalid.
>
>> I have changed it to
>
>> +/*
>> + * Hawkboard.org based on TI's OMAP-L138 Platform
>> + *
>> + * Initial code: Syed Mohammed Khasim
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2009 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com
>> + *
>> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
>> License
>> + * version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any warranty of
>> + * any kind, whether express or implied.
>> + */
>
>> Is this Ok ?
>
>   I guess so.
>
>> Thanks for the help I am really interested to give initial support for
>> Hawkboard
>
>> Sincerely yours
>
>> VIctor Rodriguez
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to