On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Victor Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:40 AM, Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 02.09.2010 4:30, Victor Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>>>>> Basic support for Hawkboard OMAPL138 just UART cominication is included
>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Victor Rodriguez<[email protected]>
>>
>>>>> Notes:  This patch deletes empty lines and typo mistakes from previous
>>>>> version
>>
>>>>   These notes belong to the space under the --- tear line, not to the
>>>> patch
>>>> description.
>>
>>> Ok sorry my mistake, fIxed for next version
>>
>>>>>        This patch is checked with
>>>>> 0a50e05b20f3c6af67656303bdb3661a2541ce03
>>>>> from
>>>>>        Kernel development tree for TI DaVinci family of processors
>>
>>>>>        This patch works with basic da8xx_omapl_defconfig, it just have
>>>>> basic support
>>>>>        for UART console
>>
>>>>>        This patch just works with UART 2 for argo file system
>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Victor Rodriguez<[email protected]>
>>
>>>> [...]
>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig
>>>>> b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig
>>>>> index 2bf03e9..fd8a11c 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig
>>>>> @@ -185,6 +185,15 @@ config MACH_TNETV107X
>>>>>        help
>>>>>          Say Y here to select the TI TNETV107X Evaluation Module.
>>>>>  +config MACH_OMAPL138_HAWKBOARD
>>>>> +       bool "TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18xx Hawkboard(.org) Platform"
>>>>> +       default ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
>>
>>>>   As I've already said, only EVM boards are enabled by default.
>>
>>> Question i have deleted the
>>
>>> default ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
>>
>>> but I have a problem because my board-da850-hawk.c does not compile
>>> and because of that when i boot the uImage is impossible to uncompress
>>> my kernel image.
>>
>>> So do you suggest any other way to fix that with out altering the
>>> da8xx_omapl_defconfig?
>>
>>   Why do you not want to alter it? I think you should.
>
>
> Because the discussion that exist in defconfig files in the
> [email protected] mailing list, Linus complain about the
> lack of order in defconfig files.
>
> But if you sugest that is ok i would try to modify .
>
> So i leave the Kconfig just like this ?
>
> +config MACH_OMAPL138_HAWKBOARD
> +       bool "TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18xx Hawkboard(.org) Platform"
> +       depends on ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
> +       help
> +         Say Y here to select the TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18xx Hawkboard.
> +         Information of this board may be found at
> +         http://www.hawkboard.org/


One more question

I have checked the Michael Williamson patch and he has

+config MACH_MITYOMAPL138
+       bool "Critical Link MityDSP-L138/MityARM-1808 SoM"
+       default ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850 >> just like my patch
+       depends on ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
+       help
+         Say Y here to select the Critical Link MityDSP-L138/MityARM-1808
+         System on Module.  Information on this SoM may be found at
+         http://www.mitydsp.com
+

Why is this ok ?

And he only alter the da8xx-omapl-defconfig by this way


diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/da8xx_omapl_defconfig
b/arch/arm/configs/da8xx_omapl_defconfig
index ba66705..3952a4e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/da8xx_omapl_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/da8xx_omapl_defconfig
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ CONFIG_I2C_DAVINCI=y
 # CONFIG_HWMON is not set
 CONFIG_WATCHDOG=y
 CONFIG_REGULATOR=y
+CONFIG_REGULATOR_DUMMY=y
 CONFIG_REGULATOR_TPS6507X=y
 CONFIG_FB=y
 CONFIG_FB_DA8XX=y

Any clue what I am doing this wrong


Thanks

Victor Rodriguez



>
> Thanks
>
> Sincerely yours
>
> VIctor  Rodriguez
>
>
>>> I have already checked the latest change in Kconfig ant is
>>
>>> config MACH_TNETV107X
>>>        bool "TI TNETV107X Reference Platform"
>>>        default ARCH_DAVINCI_TNETV107X
>>>        depends on ARCH_DAVINCI_TNETV107X
>>>        help
>>>          Say Y here to select the TI TNETV107X Evaluation Module.
>>
>>> which also has default.
>>
>>   Because this is the evaluation board.
>>
>>> Please clarify this doubt Is one of the few thinks that i need in
>>> order to implement the patch
>>
>>>> [...]
>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-hawk.c
>>>>> b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-hawk.c
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 0000000..4a7f2da
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-hawk.c
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * Hawkboard.org based on TI's OMAP-L138 Platform
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Initial code: Syed Mohammed Khasim
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2009 Texas Instruments Incorporated -
>>>>> http://www.ti.com
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Derived from: arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da830-hawk.c
>>
>>   Oh, and this was bogus too.
>>
>>>>> + * Original Copyrights follow:
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * 2007, 2009 (c) MontaVista Software, Inc. This file is licensed under
>>
>>>>   As I said, the original copyright is invalid.
>>
>>> I have changed it to
>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Hawkboard.org based on TI's OMAP-L138 Platform
>>> + *
>>> + * Initial code: Syed Mohammed Khasim
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2009 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com
>>> + *
>>> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
>>> License
>>> + * version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any warranty of
>>> + * any kind, whether express or implied.
>>> + */
>>
>>> Is this Ok ?
>>
>>   I guess so.
>>
>>> Thanks for the help I am really interested to give initial support for
>>> Hawkboard
>>
>>> Sincerely yours
>>
>>> VIctor Rodriguez
>>
>> WBR, Sergei
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to