Hello. S.Ghosh wrote:
Please don't use HTML, as it spoils message quoting when I reply.
Not sure why you mention DA850 EVM in the subject -- this patch doesn't touch it.
[SG] -- Should I mention it as "davinci: ".
Why not just DA850?
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c index 63916b9..ebc8700 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c @@ -238,6 +238,12 @@ static struct clk tptc2_clk = { .flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED, }; +static struct clk pru_clk = { + .name = "pru_ck",
We don't add _ck postfixes in DaVinci code.
[SG] -- Will change to pruss_clk
We don't add postfixes at all, so just "pruss".
@@ -542,7 +549,12 @@ static const struct mux_config da850_pins[] = {MUX_CFG(DA850, EMA_CLK, 6, 0, 15, 1, false) MUX_CFG(DA850, EMA_WAIT_1, 6, 24, 15, 1, false) MUX_CFG(DA850, NEMA_CS_2, 7, 0, 15, 1, false)+ /* PRU functions for soft CAN */ + MUX_CFG(DA850, PRU0_R31_0, 7, 28, 15, 0, false) + MUX_CFG(DA850, PRU1_R30_15, 12, 0, 15, 4, false) + MUX_CFG(DA850, PRU1_R31_18, 11, 20, 15, 0, false)
Still not properly aligned.
[SG] -- This is only occurring with the emails, the original patch does not have them. I am a newbie to open source, please let me know if I am doing something wrong.
Perhaps you should use 'git send-email' to send the patches, so that they don't get spoiled. Ah, I've just looked at your mail again and realized that you already use it. Then I really don't know -- your following line (adding GPIO2[0]) looks properly aligned...
WBR, Sergei _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
