--- Begin Message ---> That has proven to never really be an issue. When a network upstream > of another network says they don't support additional databases for > IRR, so far that has always proven to actually mean they've never > needed to think about supporting multiple databases, and never had the > demand to do the work to change that. > > In other words, it's not that they *can't* support other > databases. It's that they never have, and it's just the "way things > have been done". It's always ended up that they *can* support multiple > databases if asked to.when negotiating with a prospective peer, i would rather not add "you will have to change operational practice and code for this to work." randy
--- End Message ---
- Re: [db-wg] out of region routi... Gert Doering via db-wg
- Re: [db-wg] out of region r... Lu Heng via db-wg
- Re: [db-wg] out of region r... Sebastian Wiesinger via db-wg
- Re: [db-wg] out of region routing in th... Daniel Shaw via db-wg
- [db-wg] out of region routing in t... denis walker via db-wg
- Re: [db-wg] out of region routi... Nick Hilliard via db-wg
- Re: [db-wg] out of region routing in the RIP... Yang Yu via db-wg
- Re: [db-wg] out of region routing in the RIP... Stefan Ideler via db-wg
- Re: [db-wg] out of region routing in th... Nick Hilliard via db-wg
- Re: [db-wg] out of region routing in th... Daniel Shaw via db-wg
- Re: [db-wg] out of region routing i... Randy Bush via db-wg
- Re: [db-wg] out of region routi... Daniel Shaw via db-wg