On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 10:29:42PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Edward Shryane via db-wg wrote on 07/07/2021 15:05: > > So 23456 is*not* excluded, but it can be if the DB-WG agrees. > > just to be clearer: AS23456 should be included in the list of ASNs which > cannot be used as the origin.
Yes. > Any objects which refer to it should be flagged for deletion. Are you referring to RIPE or RIPE-NONAUTH? In 'RIPE-NONAUTH' no references appear to 23456. In 'RIPE' (the authoritative database) there are quite a few references to 23456. I would propose a "do not disturb existing objects" strategy for data source 'RIPE'. Because if there are no route/route6 objects with 23456 as 'origin:' (as Cynthia indicated), then the key 'members: AS23456' will be a NO-OP when doing reverse lookups through IRR AS-SETs to generate a prefix filterlist. Kind regards, Job
