Hi Hank, As Ed mentioned earlier in the thread all of those except AS23456 are already blocked.
-Cynthia On Thu, Jul 8, 2021, 08:14 Hank Nussbacher via db-wg <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/07/2021 00:29, Nick Hilliard via db-wg wrote: > > Edward Shryane via db-wg wrote on 07/07/2021 15:05: > >> So 23456 is*not* excluded, but it can be if the DB-WG agrees. > > > > just to be clearer: AS23456 should be included in the list of ASNs which > > cannot be used as the origin. > > > > Any objects which refer to it should be flagged for deletion. > > > > Nick > > Why single out 23456 when there are many other ASNs such as those listed > here: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_system_(Internet)#ASN_Table > > In the same way we would not allow 10.0.0.0 to appear as an inetnum in > the DB, so too numerous private use and reserved ASNs should not appear > in the DB. > > Regards, > Hank > > >
