Hi, My opinions on this can probably be summed up with me pretty much entirely agreeing with Job, Randy, and mostly with Gert.
With regards to Gert's reply I would just like to say that I think trying to decide who is and isn't a legal entity is something really complicated and last I checked the NCC didn't seem to be great at it. Some kinds of legal structures like partnerships or associations might be legal entities in some jurisdictions but not in others. I think a better argument here is that being able to create an inet(6)num object with a tech-c/admin-c that has someone's personal details in it but no ability to put a geofeed attribute in it due to the prefix size seems like an extremely weird situation. If the NCC legal team thinks this makes sense then I would love to hear how on earth they think it makes more sense to publish someone's name, address, and phone number, than to publish a URL that might contain the location of the device(s) using that IP address (which the NCC doesn't publish directly). (especially as I think people would rarely make it more specific than a city or borough) -Cynthia On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 9:06 PM Randy Bush via db-wg <[email protected]> wrote: > > hi ed: > > one step forward, one back. > > in a previous life, i was a programming language hacker snd compiler > writer. we used to make very strong negative review of any proposals > to muck about with semantics in comment fields. just don't. > > randy > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
