> On 20220224, at 16:48, Edward Shryane via db-wg <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Job,
> 
>> On 24 Feb 2022, at 16:31, Job Snijders <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Ed,
>> 
>> Thank you for the message. Apologies for nitpicking a bit more :-)
> 
> Not at all, thank you for reviewing the details.
> 
>> 
>> In the 'inet6num' listing you reference ">= /48", did you mean to write
>> "> /48"? (which would conceptually align with the cut-off in ipv4: "> /24")
>> 
> 
> This is intentional and as currently implemented, we do not allow geofeed on 
> any assignments that are reasonably assumed to be related to one individual 
> user.

But one could have a /48 with linknets or even delegations of /56 that go to 
several separate users in the same city.

At which point, pointing to the city is well, needed, and cannot currently be 
done.

Greets,
 Jeroen


-- 

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your 
subscription options, please visit: 
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg

Reply via email to