On Wed, 28 May 2025 at 08:09, Sasha Romijn via db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
[...] > That does not sound practical to me. We should not end up with radically > different layouts and validation rules for a role/person in the DB, depending > on whether it is referenced from a tech-c or a zone-c. If we want to defer > zone-c/abuse-c to other WGs, they should at least be involved early - I would > prefer us to adjust role/person in a single change to a new set of > requirements. It would be confusing to say to users "yes, your role object is > valid, but you tried to use it in a zone-c, and you can't do that until you > remove the signal contact attribute". Good point! I think you are right. Thanks, Leo ----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/db-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
