On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 01:42:03PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:31:03 +0000, Tim Bunce <tim.bu...@pobox.com> > wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 05:10:07PM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote: > > > On Oct 29, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Tim Bunce wrote: > > > > > >> I could arrange for Callbacks to only apply to methods called by the > > >> applicationi, and not to 'nested calls'. That's a fairly major change > > >> after this length of time but given the limited use Callbacks have had, > > >> and the lack of documentation, it's not out of the question. > > >> > > >> The downside is that to intercept all fetched rows in a general way > > >> (like some kind of plugin utility module might want to do) you now have > > >> to add callbacks for 7 $sth fetch* methods and 6 $dbh select* methods. > > >> > > >> Is that really preferable? > > > > > > Well, yes. > > > > Okay. Anyone else care to express an opinion? > > So far I didn't really follow. I just assumed that all would go well. > Will any of this influence DBD authors to have to change/add/update > their modules?
No. Callbacks are handled entirely by the DBI method dispatcher (like RaiseError, for example). Tim.
