I agree. Since the current running vote results are strongly in favor of
dropping the rationale for voting, I'd say this one has no time limits but that
we still have the 3 days as a minimum. -- Darren Duncan
On 2018-01-17 2:34 PM, John Napiorkowski wrote:
Karen's points are well taken; I for one would be willing to be lax on the 72
hour rule to at least give mst a chance to say something. I believe he's lately
out of the game for personal reasons. -jnap
On Wednesday, January 17, 2018, 2:54:08 PM CST, Karen Etheridge wrote:
I have questions, before I vote:
- Is there an official response from Peter Rabbitson regarding this proposal?
- Is there an official response from the current comaint-bit holders (FREW,
ILMARI, JROBINSON, MSTROUT)?
- What would the upcoming development plans be if this vote failed? If this
passed?
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
