Hola, Pascal Craponne wrote: > So, here are the options: > 1. We can use an additional identifier in the connection string (I love > this idea). Can this work with Mono requirements?
Yes. I love the idea too :) Atsushi Eno --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
