nevermind, i found a thread on it.
-b
On Dec 1, 4:26 pm, bryan costanich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I second that.
>
> the other ones are either too slow, too hacky, or just plain brittle.
>
> what's the status on this? has anyone tried implementing it?
>
> On Oct 7, 4:53 am, Atsushi Eno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hola,
>
> > Pascal Craponne wrote:
> > > So, here are the options:
> > > 1. We can use an additional identifier in the connection string (I love
> > > this idea). Can this work with Mono requirements?
>
> > Yes. I love the idea too :)
>
> > Atsushi Eno
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"DbLinq" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
