I second that. the other ones are either too slow, too hacky, or just plain brittle.
what's the status on this? has anyone tried implementing it? On Oct 7, 4:53 am, Atsushi Eno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hola, > > Pascal Craponne wrote: > > So, here are the options: > > 1. We can use an additional identifier in the connection string (I love > > this idea). Can this work with Mono requirements? > > Yes. I love the idea too :) > > Atsushi Eno --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DbLinq" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dblinq?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
