What, you are using InnoDB tables without transactions?

Drew Northup, N1XIM


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul J Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 4:18 PM
> To: Jesse Norell; DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] Two bottlenecks in db_getmailbox
>
>
>
> Ok Jesse, thanks for the pointer.
>
> Looks like db_imap_append uses its own version of the insertion
> logic and still inserts messages with empty
> unique_ids during the insertion sequence. That should be fixed,
> if only be wrapping this in a transaction.
> Come to think of it, wouldn't transactions actually do?
>
> db_copymsg looks ok to me.
>
>
> Jesse Norell wrote:
> >
> >>>And the second query changed to: [SELECT message_idnr, seen_flag,
> >>>recent_flag FROM dbmail_messages WHERE mailbox_idnr = '9' AND status <
> >>>'2' AND length(unique_id) > 0 ORDER BY message_idnr ASC]
> >>
> >>unique_id!='' should go where not absolutely required.
> >>
> >>Any objections to removing that particular restraint from the code?
> >>
> >>I really don't know how that one ever got in. If anyone happens to know,
> >
> > please speak or be silent for ever
> >
> >>more :-) In my database there are no messages with an empty
> unique_id. And
> >
> > there shouldn't be. Such sanity
> >
> >>checks shouldn't hog the real-time performance, and be deferred to
> >
> > asynchronous maintenance like dbmail-util.
> >
> >
> >   Obviously from my last post, I'm not through my inbox yet...
> > As I mentioned, in at least one place in old (1.x) dbmail mail insertion
> > (from memory, it seemed to be in the imap code, with a copy command
> > or somesuch) the status flag was not used to mark a message that
> > wasn't yet fully inserted (I think everywhere else the status was set
> > to 5 or something) - so everywhere that checked a message status also
> > got addended with an "AND unique_id != ''" clause and probably at some
> > later point someone looked at indexes in use and added unique_id to
> > a lot of them.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jesse Norell
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not my email address;
> > change "administrator" to my first name.
> > --
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dbmail-dev mailing list
> > Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
> > http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
> >
>
>
> --
>    ________________________________________________________________
>    Paul Stevens                                  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>    NET FACILITIES GROUP                     PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>    The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
>
>

Reply via email to