On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 17:25, Matt Dickinson wrote: > Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: > > I assume these patches are all against CVS (aka 2.0 branch). > > No, sorry. 1.2 branch. > I'll take a look @ 2.0 branch tomorrow.
Good as, I would assume that these changes would not be accepted into CVS for 1.2, but might (I think should) be accepted for 2.0.
