But it seems to have one big flaw, postfix. Spam prevention is only done after a message has been received, while sendmail milters can reject a message during negotation with the sender.
Did you solve this in some way or the other? /Marc On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:38:42PM +0200, Matija Grabnar wrote: > Marc Dirix wrote: > > >What are your experiences? How scalable is it? > > > > > Postfix is _very_ scalable. In my previous job I managed servers which > pushed milions of messages per day through amavis/spamassassin/clamav. > It was all postfix based (this after our mail guru did a thorough > paralel testing of sendmai, qmail, postfix and other candidates that I > no longer remember). > > I seem to remember postfix beat sendmail by an order of magnitude in > throughput.
