Paul J Stevens wrote: > > Actually, 5.1.32 was released last week which was pitched as production > quality. Personally, I'll stick with Monty's advice: avoid 5.1: > > > http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/11/oops-we-did-it-again-mysql-51-released.html > >
Has anybody compared the performance of dbmail when running on the 3 backends? _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
