Michael Haas wrote: > Kingsley Idehen wrote: > >> >> Just read the text of: http://dbpedia.org/sparql (where the timeout >> finput field is). > > "Execution timeout, in milliseconds, values less than 1000 are ignored"? > > I did read that, but I assumed that entering a value less than 1000 > would just use the default timeout of the Anytime Query feature > instead of disabling it. > > >> >> You could have just clicked "Run Query" and seen "&timeout" at the >> end. You could have also done a backspace and hit "enter" to see it >> is a clean extension. Instead, you decided to offer a lecture of >> SPARQL compliance etc. >> > > It has only become apparent (to me, at least) that it *is* a clean > extension (ie opt-in) after Mitko joined the conversation. Yes, additional participants typically fix broken conversations. That's why conversations are so important, even more so now that we are morphing the Web into a distributed and structured discussion space :-) > > Let me sum this up: > > * I'd consider it a bad thing ("broken" from my first posting in this > thread) if Anytime Queries were enabled by default. They are not > enabled by default. Everything is good. > * Anytime queries are good, if supplied with a good protocol - which > no doubt you're going to do. I'm looking forward to seeing some > documentation on this feature - I've been working with other triple > stores which shall remain nameless which would benefit from such a thing. > * Weekends are good. I hope everyone is going to have a great one :)
Great :-) Kingsley > > > Regards, > > Michael > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
