A minor inconsistency I've noticed in dbpedia is that the OWL
ontology is represented in RDF/XML, while the rest of dbpedia is in NT.
I like NT. I've got a special-purpose NT parser that works very
well with dbpedia. (I found that many commercial & OS RDF tools can't
handle the dbpedia dumps; at some point I realized I have to parse the
files in front of me rather than support a "standard")
Any chance we could get the OWL ontology in NT as well?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
