Jens Lehmann wrote: > Hello, > > Paul Houle schrieb: > >> Any chance we could get the OWL ontology in NT as well? >> > > It can be converted of course: > http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.2/en/dbpedia-ontology.nt > > Kind regards, > > Jens > I ran it through a converter last night and got a document that, like yours, contained blank nodes. These are implicit in the RDF-XML, but need to be named in order to be serialized as NT. That's one substantial difference between the OWL ontology and the rest of dbpedia.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
