Hello, Paul Houle schrieb: > Jens Lehmann wrote: > I ran it through a converter last night and got a document that, > like yours, contained blank nodes. These are implicit in the RDF-XML, > but need to be named in order to be serialized as NT. That's one > substantial difference between the OWL ontology and the rest of dbpedia.
That's true. If you do not like the blank nodes, you could perform a string replace, e.g. "_:genid" replaced by "http://dbpedia.org/genid/";. In general, an OWL axiom may require several RDF triples to represent it. Usually, this is done by introducing blank nodes. Kind regards, Jens -- Dipl. Inf. Jens Lehmann Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig Homepage: http://www.jens-lehmann.org GPG Key: http://jens-lehmann.org/jens_lehmann.asc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
