Please enable commenting on the Google Doc. I have spotted typos
" Identifiers and data provided by DBpedia was greatly involved in creating
this knowledge graph." -> identifiers and data ... were
I also have comments about ideas:
"Mapping service from Wikidata properties to DBpedia ontology" -> I am not
sure that syntax is nice. Instead of using the mappings wiki, with GSoC
money, in 3 months, we could probably do something better. More like the
mapping tool, or like WikiData itself does. I don't see why we need that
ridiculous wiki syntax to be any more in the middle of our lives. A simple
database-backed application would do it. All we need is to associate
identifiers from once source to identifiers of another source.
There was a nice thread at the WikiData list from which we could extract a
couple of nice things for our GSoC2013 proposal:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.wikimedia.wikidata/728
1) BBC is effectively using DBpedia to solve very real world problems. This
should be in our intro.
2)
- Our identification mechanism needs work
- Our simplistic typing heuristics via Infobox needs work
These two things could be *part* of GSoC 2013 projects.
Cheers,
Pablo
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Jimmy O'Regan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 27 March 2013 21:47, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On 27 March 2013 17:47, Jimmy O'Regan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On 27 March 2013 15:51, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> Hi Jimmy,
> >>>
> >>> thanks for your tips! I added/extended two ideas yesterday. I ended up
> >>> at six to eight paragraphs with 400 to 500 words. Do you think that's
> >>> too long? The 2012 ideas I looked at were shorter.
> >>
> >> What I intended to say didn't come out quite as I meant :) -- more
> >> information is, of course, better, but it shouldn't be a requirement.
> >>
> >> At Apertium, the model we've settled on, over the last few years of
> >> trial and error, is this:
> >> http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Ideas_for_Google_Summer_of_Code - a
> >> brief description, a rationale (why this is necessary), and a link to
> >> a page that describes the problem in more depth. Last year, we didn't
> >> have a page for each project, but one of the other guys had some spare
> >> time this year.
> >
> > Wow, looks very nice. In what form did you submit the ideas to Google?
>
> Google ask for a link to the page with the ideas in the application,
> so the ideas that they see are the same as the ones that the students
> see.
>
> --
> <Sefam> Are any of the mentors around?
> <jimregan> yes, they're the ones trolling you
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
> Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest.
> Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game
> on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes.
> Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Dbp-spotlight-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbp-spotlight-developers
>
--
Pablo N. Mendes
http://pablomendes.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest.
Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game
on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes.
Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
