All links are missing. I think they are important.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas <[email protected]>wrote:
> I think it is better this way.
> DBpedia.org has a very strange markdown / wiki format and it took me too
> long to convert the gdoc.
> BTW, I also removed some text from JC's ideas because they were breaking
> the formatting
>
> Cheers,
> Dimitris
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Pablo N. Mendes
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> I noticed. I assume that from now on, comments go via e-mail and final
>> changes should be added directly to the wiki?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Pablo
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Pablo,
>>>
>>> I disabled the editing of GDoc, we will use the wiki page from now on
>>> wiki.dbpedia.org/gsoc2013/ideas
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Dimitris
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Pablo N. Mendes <[email protected]
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please enable commenting on the Google Doc. I have spotted typos
>>>> " Identifiers and data provided by DBpedia was greatly involved in
>>>> creating this knowledge graph." -> identifiers and data ... were
>>>>
>>>> I also have comments about ideas:
>>>> "Mapping service from Wikidata properties to DBpedia ontology" -> I am
>>>> not sure that syntax is nice. Instead of using the mappings wiki, with GSoC
>>>> money, in 3 months, we could probably do something better. More like the
>>>> mapping tool, or like WikiData itself does. I don't see why we need that
>>>> ridiculous wiki syntax to be any more in the middle of our lives. A simple
>>>> database-backed application would do it. All we need is to associate
>>>> identifiers from once source to identifiers of another source.
>>>>
>>>> There was a nice thread at the WikiData list from which we could
>>>> extract a couple of nice things for our GSoC2013 proposal:
>>>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.wikimedia.wikidata/728
>>>>
>>>> 1) BBC is effectively using DBpedia to solve very real world problems.
>>>> This should be in our intro.
>>>>
>>>> 2)
>>>> - Our identification mechanism needs work
>>>> - Our simplistic typing heuristics via Infobox needs work
>>>>
>>>> These two things could be *part* of GSoC 2013 projects.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Pablo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Jimmy O'Regan <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 27 March 2013 21:47, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > On 27 March 2013 17:47, Jimmy O'Regan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >> On 27 March 2013 15:51, Jona Christopher Sahnwaldt <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>> Hi Jimmy,
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> thanks for your tips! I added/extended two ideas yesterday. I
>>>>> ended up
>>>>> >>> at six to eight paragraphs with 400 to 500 words. Do you think
>>>>> that's
>>>>> >>> too long? The 2012 ideas I looked at were shorter.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> What I intended to say didn't come out quite as I meant :) -- more
>>>>> >> information is, of course, better, but it shouldn't be a
>>>>> requirement.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> At Apertium, the model we've settled on, over the last few years of
>>>>> >> trial and error, is this:
>>>>> >> http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Ideas_for_Google_Summer_of_Code - a
>>>>> >> brief description, a rationale (why this is necessary), and a link
>>>>> to
>>>>> >> a page that describes the problem in more depth. Last year, we
>>>>> didn't
>>>>> >> have a page for each project, but one of the other guys had some
>>>>> spare
>>>>> >> time this year.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Wow, looks very nice. In what form did you submit the ideas to
>>>>> Google?
>>>>>
>>>>> Google ask for a link to the page with the ideas in the application,
>>>>> so the ideas that they see are the same as the ones that the students
>>>>> see.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> <Sefam> Are any of the mentors around?
>>>>> <jimregan> yes, they're the ones trolling you
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
>>>>> Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest.
>>>>> Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game
>>>>> on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes.
>>>>> Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Dbp-spotlight-developers mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbp-spotlight-developers
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Pablo N. Mendes
>>>> http://pablomendes.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
>>>> Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest.
>>>> Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game
>>>> on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes.
>>>> Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Dbp-spotlight-developers mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbp-spotlight-developers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kontokostas Dimitris
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Pablo N. Mendes
>> http://pablomendes.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Kontokostas Dimitris
>
--
Pablo N. Mendes
http://pablomendes.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest.
Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game
on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes.
Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
