Hi *, we[1] want to provide links between lobid and dbpedia. We would like to use an other predicate as the recommended ones[2].
lobid describes manifestations of library resources, e. g. books. We find that predicates like "owl:sameAs" do not fit , because the dbpedia resources often don't only describe books but also other forms of manifestations (e .g. a play or a movie). Thus we use the predicate rdrel:workManifested[3] to link our manifestations to dbpedia resources, e. g.: <http://lobid.org/resource/HT014469321> <http://rdvocab.info/RDARelationshipsWEMI/workManifested> <http://dbpedia.org/resource/The_Last_Man> . This "means" : the lobid-resource is a "physical embodiment of an expression of a work", and that work is the dbpedia-resource (while work is defined as "A distinct intellectual or artistic creation"). As for the dbpedia_links we would like to use the inverse predicate - that would be rdrel:manifestationOfWork[4] . This would imply that these dbpedia-resources are rdf:type rdrel:Work[5] (we find that quite fitting, although not every wikipedia entry is actually a "work" (e .g. [6] is rather a "manifestation" - sure someday someone will correct this entry ). What do you think - should rdrel:manifestationOfWork be recommended in our case? -o [1]http://lobid.org/ [2]https://github.com/dbpedia/dbpedia-links [3]http://rdvocab.info/RDARelationshipsWEMI/workManifested [4]http://rdvocab.info/RDARelationshipsWEMI/manifestationOfWork [5]http://rdvocab.info/uri/schema/FRBRentitiesRDA/Work [6]http://dbpedia.org/resource/Five_Go_Off_to_Camp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2 _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
