There was a blog post a few years ago that talked about owl:sameAs and how
confidence in owl:sameAs is raised if both datasets make the assertion. I'm
having trouble finding it now, but it was a thoughtful post.
Jeff
From: Tom Morris [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 10:54 AM
To: Young,Jeff (OR)
Cc: Stephen Somerville; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] VIAF extraction?
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Young,Jeff (OR)
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Stephen,
While you're waiting, you could get the owl:sameAs assertions in the reverse
direction from the VIAF data dumps. An N-TRIPLE form was added to the
processing about a week ago, which should make it easier to consume:
http://viaf.org/viaf/data/viaf-20130514-clusters-rdf.nt.gz
The problem I see with working from the VIAF end is that when these links were
added to Wikpedia, the Wikipedians went through and corrected (or at least
flagged) a lot of errors, so working from the Wikipedia version will have the
benefit of those corrections.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VIAF/errors
Tom
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
