I think a big part of my desire to be able to pull VIAFs for individuals is
to use as a more persistent URI than the DBpedia resource URI. Is there any
other kind of persistent ID within DBpedia that I'm overlooking?
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Young,Jeff (OR) <[email protected]> wrote:
> There was a blog post a few years ago that talked about owl:sameAs and
> how confidence in owl:sameAs is raised if both datasets make the assertion.
> I’m having trouble finding it now, but it was a thoughtful post.****
>
> ** **
>
> Jeff****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Tom Morris [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 19, 2013 10:54 AM
> *To:* Young,Jeff (OR)
> *Cc:* Stephen Somerville; [email protected]
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] VIAF extraction?****
>
> ** **
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Young,Jeff (OR) <[email protected]> wrote:*
> ***
>
> Stephen,
>
> While you're waiting, you could get the owl:sameAs assertions in the
> reverse direction from the VIAF data dumps. An N-TRIPLE form was added to
> the processing about a week ago, which should make it easier to consume:
>
> http://viaf.org/viaf/data/viaf-20130514-clusters-rdf.nt.gz****
>
> ** **
>
> The problem I see with working from the VIAF end is that when these links
> were added to Wikpedia, the Wikipedians went through and corrected (or at
> least flagged) a lot of errors, so working from the Wikipedia version will
> have the benefit of those corrections.****
>
> ** **
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VIAF/errors****
>
> ** **
>
> Tom****
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
