That’s how this works – until there is corroborated evidence, it remains speculation. I'm sure Andy and Rob said the same thing to themselves (“I know it’s correct”) when first handling this material. For the benefit of the community here, let’s hope someday comes sooner than later so this can be put to rest.
From: Charlie Miller [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 9:34 AM To: kevin; 'Caleb Kennedy'; '[email protected]' Subject: Re: 10/5/70 Winterland I've given all of the info that I can give. I know it's correct, but I understand your position. Do what you must. I actually have more to 10/5/70 than what is listed. Someday I'll organize it and will get it out. From: kevin <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 12:16 PM To: 'Charlie Miller' <mailto:[email protected]> ; 'Caleb Kennedy' <mailto:[email protected]> ; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: 10/5/70 Winterland Charlie, not trying to be difficult and while I’m sure we’d all like to have songs dated correctly, this particular story proves that even the best sources of information, from folks actually handling vault reels, can be wrong. I think the best thing that can be said is that it is likely the song is from 10/5 but not conclusively. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charlie Miller Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 9:31 AM To: kevin; 'Caleb Kennedy'; '[email protected]' Subject: Re: 10/5/70 Winterland I was told that the multitracks from 10/4 and 10/5 were mized on 12/23 which is why there's confusion. I have my songs dated properly. From: kevin <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 11:48 AM To: 'Charlie Miller' <mailto:[email protected]> ; 'Caleb Kennedy' <mailto:[email protected]> ; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: 10/5/70 Winterland If there were a way to isolate it to one of the dates, yes, that would work. However that inserts too much assumption.. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charlie Miller Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 3:12 PM To: kevin; 'Caleb Kennedy'; '[email protected]' Subject: Re: 10/5/70 Winterland Process of elimination. It's not 10/4 and not 12/23. From: kevin <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 4:23 PM To: 'Charlie Miller' <mailto:[email protected]> ; 'Caleb Kennedy' <mailto:[email protected]> ; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: 10/5/70 Winterland There is no posted evidence that it belongs to 10/5. Please provide From: Charlie Miller [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 12:34 PM To: Caleb Kennedy; kevin; [email protected] Subject: Re: 10/5/70 Winterland The reels I have from 12/23/70 have a different me and my uncle than the one that circulates. the one tht circs is from 10/5/70. From: Caleb Kennedy <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 6:59 AM To: kevin <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] Subject: RE: 10/5/70 Winterland That looks like the gist of it. Charlie Miller has announced that he has the master of 12/23/70 and will presumably be issuing it; so we'll soon see whether the Hard to Handle, Candyman, and MAMU are from 12/23 or not... -----Original Message----- >From: kevin <[email protected]> >Sent: Feb 24, 2011 5:03 PM >To: 'Caleb Kennedy' <[email protected]>, >[email protected] >Subject: RE: 10/5/70 Winterland > >To simplify that drawn out blog entry, this is what I've deciphered: > >12/17/70 list >Hard To Handle - No evidence where it really belongs. Based on the confusion >could just as well be part of the real 12/23 as that list is incomplete >Candyman - ditto >Me And My Uncle - ditto >Cold Rain And Snow - Side by side listening proves this is from 10/4 >Dancing In The Street - - Side by side listening proves this is from 10/5 > >12/23/70 list >Cold Rain And Snow (on both 12/23 and 12/17) - Side by side listening proves >this is from 10/4 >Dancing In The Street (on both 12/23 and 12/17) - Side by side listening >proves this is from 10/5 >Uncle John's Band - - Side by side listening proves this is from 10/4 > >I think this covers the gist of it. Please confirm. > >Kevin
