On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 01:02:20PM +0100, Moray Allan wrote: > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Gunnar Wolf <[email protected]> wrote: > > - Debian roles - I'm including the following, mainly aiming at getting > > numbers for statistics (nothing should be decided upon them): > > - Debian Developer > > - Debian Developer (non-uploading) > > - Debian Maintainer > > - Otherwise involved in Debian > > - Not yet involved but interested > > - Accompanying a Debian participant > > - None > > Do you agree with this? Am I missing anything? Should I squash any > > two (i.e. uploading and nonuploading DD)? > > I don't see the sense in separating those. Both mean "Debian member", > and separating them risks it sounding like we think one is less good > than the other.
Seconded. I suggest to have a "Debian Project Member" entry, then a
"Debian contributor" entry (as suggested by Moray, although I'd drop the
"other", that sounds pejorative), and maybe finally a "Otherwise
interested in Debian".
I'm very much interested in the disaggregate numbers Gunnar wants to
collect for the final report. But when reading those numbers, I wouldn't
particularly care about distinctions finer than the above.
Just my 0.02€,
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o .
Maître de conférences ...... http://upsilon.cc/zack ...... . . o
Debian Project Leader ....... @zack on identi.ca ....... o o o
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
