Stefano Zacchiroli dijo [Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 08:07:31PM +0200]: > > > - Debian roles - I'm including the following, mainly aiming at getting > > > numbers for statistics (nothing should be decided upon them): > > > - Debian Developer > > > - Debian Developer (non-uploading) > > > - Debian Maintainer > > > - Otherwise involved in Debian > > > - Not yet involved but interested > > > - Accompanying a Debian participant > > > - None > > > Do you agree with this? Am I missing anything? Should I squash any > > > two (i.e. uploading and nonuploading DD)? > > > > I don't see the sense in separating those. Both mean "Debian member", > > and separating them risks it sounding like we think one is less good > > than the other. > > Seconded. I suggest to have a "Debian Project Member" entry, then a > "Debian contributor" entry (as suggested by Moray, although I'd drop the > "other", that sounds pejorative), and maybe finally a "Otherwise > interested in Debian".
Humm... I feel most of us still identify better with the DD tag - So maybe "Debian Project Member (all DDs)"? And, maybe keeping the separation between DM and other Debian contributors? > I'm very much interested in the disaggregate numbers Gunnar wants to > collect for the final report. But when reading those numbers, I wouldn't > particularly care about distinctions finer than the above. Right, that threshold is precisely what I am aiming to reach :) _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
