On 01-Jan-2001 Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> bbennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Bootable? Is the B3 supposed to be bootable?
>>
>> It passed the md5sum test and it is the official image.
>>
>> If it is supposed to be bootable, let me know.
>> This is the first I have heard of this.
>
> Um, I thought it went like this for i386:
>
> CD#1: vanilla kernel
> CD#2: compact
> CD#3: idepci
#1 & #2 correct, for potato, i386, CD#3 has no boot blocks.
It (CD#3) probably should be modified to have a boot image.
I'll take a look at it. Just the boot blocks do not take
much space. If it will fit, we probably should put idepci
on CD#3. Thoughts ???
--
Jim Westveer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
"Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with sendmail.cf.
"It never does quite what I want."
"I wish Christopher Robin were here.".
------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
work : 425-591-3002 Date: 01-Jan-2001
FAX: 425-392-0141 Time: 18:16:57
pgp-key 0x36129171 gpg-key 0x9823336C
------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
