Jim Westveer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 01-Jan-2001 Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Um, I thought it went like this for i386:
> >
> > CD#1: vanilla kernel
> > CD#2: compact
> > CD#3: idepci
>
> #1 & #2 correct, for potato, i386, CD#3 has no boot blocks.
> It (CD#3) probably should be modified to have a boot image.
>
> I'll take a look at it. Just the boot blocks do not take
> much space. If it will fit, we probably should put idepci
> on CD#3. Thoughts ???
Yes, I agree.
--
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
