On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 02:55:30PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > >Wouldn't building the .so with non-PIC break quite a few things? > > Shouldn't do, as far as I can see. Anything in particular you are thinking of? Isn't PIC used for a reason in shared libs? :) -- -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------ / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Yann Dirson
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Philip Blundell
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Ben Collins
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Philip Blundell
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Ben Collins
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Yann Dirson
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Erik Andersen
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Ben Collins
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Philip Blundell
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Erik Andersen
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Ben Collins
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Erik Andersen
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Ben Collins
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Philip Blundell
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Philip Blundell

