On Sat Jun 16, 2001 at 03:04:28PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > Uh, wrong. We compile _all_ shared libs using -fPIC (IOW, every .so). > That has nothing to do with mklibs.sh, it has to do with being a shared > lib. If you try to link a .so with non-PIC objects, some architectures > will barf all of the resulting library. When did we start doing that? What arches choke (and isn't that a linker bug on those arches)? That way why they invented the ELF relocatable object. Penalizing all non broken arches with slower fatter PIC code seems a harsh way to go. I do not see this problem on x86 or ARM... -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Yann Dirson
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Philip Blundell
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Ben Collins
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Philip Blundell
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Ben Collins
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Yann Dirson
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Erik Andersen
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Ben Collins
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Philip Blundell
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Erik Andersen
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Ben Collins
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Erik Andersen
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Ben Collins
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Philip Blundell
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Philip Blundell
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Theodore Tso
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Philip Blundell
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Theodore Tso
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. David Whedon
- Re: Patch not included in e2fsprogs 1.21. Adam Di Carlo

