On 05/08/2009, Thorsten Glaser <t.gla...@tarent.de> wrote: > Luca Favatella dixit: > >>* a screenshot of the problem I get in the (monolithic) image built >> using makefs > > Ok, I see now (forwarded to workplace): [...] > cf. http://www.mirbsd.org/htman/i386/man8/makefs.htm > > I’d say your best bet is to use -f without ‘%’ – you should know beforehand > though roughly how many new inodes (symlinks, devices (probably not, due to > devfs), temp files) you’ll need; they’re allocated in groups, so a guessti- > mate is okay.
I committed in the kfreebsd branch a draft patch using "-f"; see http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/d-i?view=rev&revision=59940 It looks like there are no regressions in the produced monolithic and netboot images. > //mirabilos Thanks, Luca Favatella -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org