On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 06:02:42PM +1300, Andrew Hill wrote: > Using the text GUI partitioning tool it appears to make the cylinders > inclusive, not exclusive. > > > fdisk /dev/sda -l > > Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > Disk identifier: 0xe0c5913d > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sda1 * 1 2550 20482843+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda2 2551 17750 122093748 7 HPFS/NTFS > /dev/sda3 17750 55804 305664000 83 Linux > /dev/sda4 55804 60802 40144897 5 Extended > /dev/sda5 55804 56290 3905536 82 Linux swap / Solaris > /dev/sda6 56290 60802 36238336 83 Linux > > As you can see sda3/sda5/sda6 all have overlapping cylinders.
One important thing to bear in mind here is that we no longer align to cylinder boundaries, because doing so results in poor performance on modern disks and the disks on which it was important to align to cylinder boundaries are decades old by now. As such, it's perfectly possible for a correct partition table to have a partition end in the middle of one cylinder and the next partition start in the middle of the same cylinder. In fact, I would expect most modern partition tables to be this way. Overlapping cylinders are fine - it's overlapping sectors that would be a real problem. For example, here's the valid partition table on my laptop (which has an SSD disk which would exhibit poor performance if aligned on cylinder boundaries, and so all partitions except for the Dell partition at the start which I should probably delete are aligned on megabyte boundaries): /dev/sda1 1 14 112423+ de Dell Utility /dev/sda2 15 9730 78038016 f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/sda5 15 9240 74104832 83 Linux /dev/sda6 9240 9730 3931136 82 Linux swap / Solaris It looks as though /dev/sda5 and /dev/sda6 overlap, right? But that's not so. 'sfdisk -d /dev/sda' shows a more detailed picture, in sectors: /dev/sda1 : start= 63, size= 224847, Id=de /dev/sda2 : start= 225280, size=156076032, Id= f /dev/sda3 : start= 0, size= 0, Id= 0 /dev/sda4 : start= 0, size= 0, Id= 0 /dev/sda5 : start= 227328, size=148209664, Id=83 /dev/sda6 : start=148439040, size= 7862272, Id=82 The size is inclusive of the first sector, so we take 227328 + 148209664 - 1 which is 148436991. This leaves 2048 sectors = 1 megabyte between the two partitions, which is the chained extended partition table plus alignment. No overlap, despite the confusing and incomplete picture presented by fdisk. > This is error from cfdisk > FATAL ERROR: Bad primary partition 3: Partition ends in the final partial > cylinder There have certainly been relatively recent versions of cfdisk that exhibited this problem for me; for example, the version in Ubuntu 10.10 does this. However, I can no longer reproduce this with the version in Debian testing/unstable (which is incidentally also in the development branch that will become Ubuntu 11.04). It looks to me as though it should have been fixed in util-linux 2.17.2-1. We would need to see your exact partition table, as reported by 'sfdisk -d /dev/sda', to figure out more. It would also be helpful to provide /var/log/partman, which shows the partitioning actions taken by the installer. Data corruption is of course a serious problem, but it is not yet clear whether it is related to your partition table layout. It could well be entirely unrelated. Regards, -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
