> > No, I don't think this is related to the problem reported in 121110. > I'm guessing 121110 has been fixed along with bug#116829 -- the > problem was the way that busybox init and telinit didn't get along > together in the context when init wasn't pid 1. > > I don't think the "fix" you outlined will fix anything. > > Assuming the good alpha folks are installing over the network, they > should be using sysvinit 2.84-1, in which case, this bug should have > already gone away.
I think your right there. My "fix" does fix something else though. It fixes reboot when in initrd, which doesn't work without the fix. I'll post a bugreport against busybox. I mixed up the two bugs in my mind cause they both disappeared at the same time for me, prob. when the new sysvinit came out and I started using my patched busybox. Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
