On Sun Dec 02, 2001 at 09:50:16PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > No, I don't think this is related to the problem reported in 121110. > > I'm guessing 121110 has been fixed along with bug#116829 -- the > > problem was the way that busybox init and telinit didn't get along > > together in the context when init wasn't pid 1. > > > > I don't think the "fix" you outlined will fix anything. > > > > Assuming the good alpha folks are installing over the network, they > > should be using sysvinit 2.84-1, in which case, this bug should have > > already gone away. > > I think your right there. My "fix" does fix something else though. > It fixes reboot when in initrd, which doesn't work without > the fix. > > I'll post a bugreport against busybox. > > I mixed up the two bugs in my mind cause they both disappeared at the > same time for me, prob. when the new sysvinit came out and I started using > my patched busybox.
I saw and very much dislike your patch. If there is a problem with busybox reboot failing to find the init process, I'm anxious to understand _why_, not just ignore it and hope it goes away. -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
