On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 22:25 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:34:13AM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 06:26:06AM +0000, Adam Barratt wrote: > > > partman-nbd/armhf unsatisfiable Depends: nbd-client-udeb > > > partman-nbd/s390x unsatisfiable Depends: nbd-client-udeb [...] > > Hmmm. That's surprising (to me). Ah, looking at the nbd package I can > > see that the udeb is not "Architecture: any" or even "Architecture: > > linux-any" like I'd expect. That's why. Wouter, could you fix that or > > at least add armhf and s390x please? [...] > Fix uploaded. It also contains a tightening of the build-dependencies to > what's effectively already there (but not specified as such in the > changelog), but (other than the Architecture: linux-any) no functional > changes.
Unblocked, but needs an explicit ack for the udeb hint. There's also this oddity, fwiw: + nbd (1:3.2-1) unstable; urgency=low + + * New upstream release. Includes many stability fixes, so hopefully nbd (1:3.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. Includes many stability fixes, so hopefully Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1356039431.24016.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
