2017/08/06 5:07 "Cyril Brulebois" <k...@debian.org>:
> Hi,
> While preparing some slides for my “News from the Debian Installer” talk
> at DebConf17, it occured to me that we might want to reconsider the
> default here:
>     Guided - use a whole disk
>     Guided - use a whole disk with LVM
>     Guided - use a whole disk with encrypted LVM
>     Manual
> Current default is the first entry, and I think we should switch to
> second one, with LVM.
> If the user doesn't need to touch anything, that doesn't change much; if
> the user wants to change partitioning afterwards, LVM's flexibility is
> available.
> Is anyone aware of any drawbacks of switching to LVM by default?
> KiBi.

This would be a source of a lot of confusion and flame wars and other
back-and-forth on debian-user.

Making LVM a recommended, guided option with a lot of hand-holding, sure,
especially if the default includes making a MSWindows readable partition
for sharing. But that is not whole disk.

Forcing people to do what we think is good for them never works out well.

Joel Rees


Reply via email to