Hi Paul, Am 27. März 2026 22:11:51 MEZ schrieb Paul Gevers <[email protected]>: > >That sounds more like a question to the Release Team. I'm trying to find the >answer. I'm wondering if this isn't a case of "no regression", and hence >could/should be ignored.
Pascal already mentioned some sort of circular dependency as the reason: partman-partitioning 161 (newly) depends on partman-base, while partman-base also depends on partman-partitioning. Maybe this helps. Holger -- Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
