Your message dated Thu, 26 Dec 2002 12:44:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174335: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#174335: no boot 
floppies for testing)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2002 10:17:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 26 04:17:26 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (bowl.fysh.org) [81.5.149.242] (mail)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18RV4w-0002bm-00; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 04:17:26 -0600
Received: from zefram by bowl.fysh.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 18RV4u-00011G-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 10:17:24 +0000
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 10:17:24 +0000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: no boot floppies for testing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: boot-floppy

There appears to be no way to install the testing release from
boot floppies.  There are no disk image subdirectories in the
/debian/dists/testing/main directory, and the boot floppies for stable
don't give any choice about which release to install.

If there's actually a good technical reason for this limitation then
it would be helpful for the install program or the installation manual
(or both) to explain this.  I know the workaround is easy; having the
problem pointed out would avoid fruitless searching for the missing
configuration option.

-zefram

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 174335-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2002 14:43:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 26 08:43:41 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from quechua.inka.de (mail.inka.de) [193.197.184.2] (mail)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18RZEb-000791-00; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 08:43:41 -0600
Received: from zombie.inka.de (nobody@[127.0.0.1])
        by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) 
        id 18RZEZ-0003db-00; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 15:43:39 +0100
Received: from inet by zombie with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 18RWQu-0005bo-00; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 12:44:12 +0100
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 12:44:12 +0100
From: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#174335: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#174335: no boot floppies 
for testing)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.4 required=5.0
        tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,
              SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL,USER_AGENT,
              USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

#include <hallo.h>
* Zefram [Thu, Dec 26 2002, 11:19:52AM]:

> If this is an intentional arrangement, then there is a documentation bug,
> as I explained in my original bug report.

WTF? You want to install Distribution B with Installer from A. What is
so hard to understand this?

Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
-- 
Windows 3.x-Airlines
Das Flughafen-Terminal ist sch�n bunt, die Stewardessen und Stewards
freundlich. Man gelangt ohne Probleme an Bord, ein reibungsloser Start
-pl�tzlich und ohne jegliche Verwarnung st�rzt dann das Flugzeug ab.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to