On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 10:51, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I've noticed some udebs require on libslang.so.1, while the cdebconf > slang frontend require libslang.so.1-UTF8. Should all udeb programs > and libraries link with UTF8 versions of libraries, or should we leave > it to the package maintainers?
I was kind of hoping that we would be able to do away with the non-UTF8 libraries altogether during the sarge development cycle. Everything should be linking against the UTF8 versions in absence of any compelling reason to do differently. p. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
